![]() The world layout, with Skyloft and the surface, also feels like an airborne Wind Waker at times, which is another favorite Zelda game of mine. So there’s a lot going on in Skyward Sword and while many of its elements ended up in Breath of the Wild, Skyward Sword still feels like a more focused game and better because of it. In that, even after maxing out everything in Breath of the Wild, it’s not overly memorable. Whereas with Skyward Sword the whole experience sticks with you, and even though I hadn’t played the Wii original since 2011, I could still recall almost all of it in this HD remake.Īs for the other quality of life improvements, they definitely help, but the somewhat contentious Zelda and Loftwing Amiibo, that allows you to return to the sky at any point, doesn’t actually make much of a difference and isn’t really a necessary purchase at all. However, it requires more effort than your typical Zelda game, not least due to the new control options available, but with diligent practice the game opens up into something genuinely beautiful.Skyward Sword HD proves we didn’t need a generation of motion controls Overall, Skyward Sword HD is a wonderful remaster and is a joy to play. The Skyward Sword remaster finds the same sense of purpose in tradition as its characters do. When it released in 2011, it both felt like it was abandoning what made the Zelda series great while holding on too dearly to traditions from later entries in the series. But it also shows now, as it did when it first came out, how rewarding some traditions can be to uphold, and it makes a concerted effort to introduce them to more people, even as it showcases why Zelda had to move on from them. If you have been censored, contact us at the Media Research Center contact form and help us hold Big Tech accountable.In 2011, some Zelda fans saw Skyward Sword as the most clear-cut case yet for how the series had lost its way. Contact your local representative and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on “hate speech” and equal footing for conservatives. “His lawsuit is based on the infringement of his fundamental free speech rights that powerful companies such as Facebook and Twitter imposed based on their own political bias a bias that has no place with such important keepers of our national public square online,” Brain said, according to The Tennessee Star.Ĭonservatives are under attack. The Tennessee Star most recently reported that Brain called Big Tech “‘beyond the point of redemption’” when commenting on former President Donald Trump’s Big Tech lawsuit announcement. The change could also potentially prevent CloutHub from overreliance on app stores choosing to carry the app, another challenge Parler faced in January.īrain’s active response mirrors the criticisms he has spoken against Big Tech several times prior. The free speech platform’s latest update will also make the platform “fully web-based” and accessible “on any mobile browser in addition to downloading the official app from a digital marketplace,” CloutHub’s press release said. “In its contract with our company, IBM agreed not to remove or censor any of our content without issuing a warning or giving us sufficient time to remedy the problem.” Brain said at the time that “IBM chose not to fulfill its contractual obligation with CloutHub” when the company allegedly removed 14 CloutHub video channels without warning or explanation, according to EIN Presswire. His concern is not unfounded after Amazon Web Services (AWS) abruptly stopped hosting the Parler app in January.ĬloutHub also experienced conflict with its former video web hosting service IBM earlier in the year. “his update includes protections that allows us to operate without threat of being shut down by big tech,” he said. The platform’s latest update came in “response to a growing demand for secure alternatives to Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram,” according to a recent press release.īrain explained the benefit of his company’s newfound autonomous status in an exclusive comment to MRC Free Speech America. “‘Crucially, CloutHub is now server autonomous – meaning that our platform does not depend on any individual hosting service,’” Brain said. CloutHub Founder and CEO Jeff Brain announced in a recent press release that his alternative social media platform will now be free from Big Tech’s web hosting services.īig Tech corporations have a notorious history of kicking free speech alternatives off their platforms, but CloutHub chose to strike first and took action before it faced the same fate as Parler.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |